THE WORLD IN FLAMES
of the World Situation
by Francis Parker Yockey (published February 1961)
In October 1946, in a quiet garden in Wiesbaden, an unknown person,
whose writings and actions are only valued by his enemies, and that negatively,
composed a short monograph entitled "The Possibilities of Germany",
and this Estimate can best begin by a short citation from that unpublished
"Eventually -- not before 15 years, not more than 30 -- the
Anglo-Saxon-Jewish combine and the Russian Empire will wage the third of the
series of World Wars."
1960 was the first year in which the world political situation was ripe for a
great war. But the exact moment of its outbreak is known to no one at this
time, not even to any clairvoyant. It may take place this year, or any year
after this, the last possible time being about 1975.
A brief comparison is in order with the situation of
1946. In that year, America-Jewry controlled, in a political if not military,
sense the entire Western Hemisphere, all of Western Europe except a part of
Germany, all of Africa, all the Near East, the Middle East, and the Far East. This
all amounted to 9/10 of the surface of the earth and more than 3/4 of the
Since then, this preponderance of power vi-a-vis Russia
has dwindled to a point where the Washington
regime at this moment has no preponderance of power vis-a-vis Russia,
but stands in an inferior power-position.
The basic reason for the diminution of power is spiritual-organic. Power will
never stay in the hands of him who does not want power and has no plan for its
use. Desire for revenge, desire to "stop Hitler", desire to destroy Europe,
desire to kill 80,000,000 Germans by the Morgenthau Plan -- all these are not
will-to-power. Will-to-power means inherently the will to do something positive
with that power, not the will to prevent something.
The more superficial and direct reason for the diminution of power was
political incapacity on the part of the Zionists, or Washington
regime as it is here interchangeably called. This incapacity manifested itself
first in total incomprehension of the Russian soul, leading to the belief that
this wild, chaotic, spirituality had surrendered itself permanently to the
guidance of a small group of Jewish intellectuals.
A person who believes that the seizing of the apparatus of power -- government,
army, police, press, education -- guarantees the continuance of power is a
political non-entity. Yet the whole Washington
regime believes this. In philosophy they are materialists and thus cannot ever
understand that visible facts are only the manifestation of invisible spiritual
To the extent that a people is materialistic in its religion and philosophy, it
is non-revolutionary, but the Russians are completely non-materialistic, being
completely dominated by feelings, and acting always from their feelings. Thus
it was that the Russians, even without disturbing the Bolshevik governmental
structure or ideology, effected a complete revolution and deprived the Jewish
leadership of all power. The Jew in contemporary Russia
is allowed to be a Jew, if he is first and foremost a Russian. In other words
he is not allowed to be a Jew, and is being exterminated without physical
Since the Washington
regime believed in the"friendliness" -- i e. Jewish domination -- of Russia,
it gave China
as it had already given part of Germany
and part of Japan.
One cannot call this treason on the part of the nincompoop Marshall who
accomplished the actual transfer of China from the Washington regime to the
Russian sphere, for he was sent by the Washington regime on this very mission,
and when he died, years later, was called by the Zionist press the greatest
soldier, etc., etc. Legally speaking, it makes no sense to say the entire
government of a country is committing treason, for it is they who define the
enemy. In a spiritual sense, of course, the Washington
regime are traitors to the United
States and its
people, but they have so defined the relationships that those who are loyal to
the United States
in a spiritual and political sense are regarded as traitors in a legal sense.
was surrendered in 1947, and lost to the control of the Washington
regime. Together with China
it accounts for about 40% of the world's population.
Since then, Egypt
has been lost and half the Arab world, through the creation of the foolish,
unnecessary Jewish State in Palestine.
have been lost, with only financial bridgeheads retained, and all the Latin
American possessions of the Washington
regime, from Nicaragua
are growing restive.
Because it retained the fiction of the independence of the European lands, the Washington
regime has imperilled its grip on France,
by allowing De Gaulle to set up himself up as a leader.
the Zionists fought against the Chinese armies they had created, through the
Great General Marshall, and these armies used the very equipment which Marshall
had delivered to them, sufficient to equip 60 divisions. Not only did they lose
the war, but they demonstrated to the entire world that the United
is inferior, and that the Zionist empire is, in the Chinese phrase, a paper
On the positive side, there is little to record. The Zionists conquered Spain
without a war, and have occupied it with their troops. They have completely
and occupied it once more with troops.
Of all that they possessed in 1946, there remain only the greater part of Latin
America, (now precariously held), all Europe except part of Germany and the
greater part of the Mediterranean littoral (also precariously held). Japan
has been lost, but Australia,
without military value, is still held. The Philippines
are still precariously held.
What the Washington
regime has lost Russia
has gained, either by extension of its influence directly or by increasing the
neutral area. The extension of neutrality is of immediate benefit to Russia,
exactly as it is of immediate loss to America-Jewry. This is so because of the
concentric shape of the geographical theater of the political struggle. Russia
occupies an inner circle, and America-Jewry an outer circle. The neutralization
Egypt et al. represent breaks in the outer circle, and weakening of the
Jewish-American economic-political structure.
This is so also for a moral reason. Jewry always claims to speak for, and to
represent, all humanity, with the exception of one unit, which is thus
automatically the enemy of humanity. In a war of attrition, it is a positive
detriment to be labelled by most of the world's press as the enemy of humanity,
even though in a short war it makes no difference. Therefore, the more the
Jewish-American control over the press of the countries of the world is
weakened, the better is Russia's
It is instructive to compare the Second and Third
World wars in their aspect of the quantitative
relationships of the combatants. In the Second World War, on the one side (Germany,
were 225,000,000 people, with an area of less than 1,000,000 square miles at
the beginning of the conflict. On the other side were approximately
1,000,000,000 people and approximately 50,000,000 square miles. In addition the
so-called neutrals (with unimportant exceptions) were enrolled in the economic
service of the Jewish-American-Russian coalition, since the coalition possessed
a monopoly of their trade.
In the distribution of 1960, the quantitative aspect looms thus: on the one
side of the Jewish-American leadership is a population of 400,000,000 and an
area of approximately 30,000,000 miles. (These figures include all North and South
America, all Western Europe,
and more than half of Africa,
together with Australia
and environs.) On the other side of the Russian-Chinese coalition is a
population of 800,000,000 and an area of approximately 15,000,000 square miles.
(This includes Russia,
and the Russian-held areas of Europe.)
These quantitative estimates are generous to the American-Jewish front, for
much of what is given is questionable, from the standpoint of military value of
the population and accessibility of the territory. Thus it is quite clear that
none of the armies in Jewish-American occupied Europe
will have great military value, since the essence of the armies, i.e. morale,
will be absent. Furthermore, the entire population of Latin
America is at best available only for economic
service; there is no expectation that in the Third, any more than in the First
or Second World Wars, this population can be used as cannon-fodder. And if the
movement for Latin American independence spreads, almost a third part of the
figures, both for population and land area given above must be stricken. If the
Arab revolt spreads further, it may cut off much of Africa
from Zionist control.
On the moral side, the two wars are quite different. In the Second World War, Germany
were both nationalist. Only secondarily, and in a propaganda way did they claim
to represent any principle which was of universal validity. Thus they offered
no great persuasion to the population in enemy countries or neutral countries
to sympathize. The Jewish-American-Russian-English etc. etc. coalition,
however, used no nationalist feelings except as propaganda against Germany.
Their whole war cry was a universal one: Freedom, Happiness, Justice; a
birthday-party every day for every person in the world.
In the Third World War two universals are offered by the contestants: on the
one side the joys of Capitalism, on the other the perfect happiness of
all got out of the League of Nations
when it was clear that it was entirely dominated by the enemy. Russia
stayed in the United Nations all through a long period when the thing was
entirely Jewish-American, and has persevered to the point where the thing can
be sometimes useful to them even though they do not have the major control.
Thus, while the United Nations was at war against Russia's
ally in Korea,
a Russian was the head of the Security Council, the organ charged with the
prosecution of the war.
A national, or particular, principle against a universal principle is at a
crushing disadvantage in a World War. But this time, the Zionists face another
Universal, and one with which half of their very own people are secretly,
half-openly, or openly in sympathy. In a wax between Capitalism and Communism,
the Jewish people finds itself physically on the one side, but spiritually on
the other. Their minds are divided from their pocketbooks. This weakens
leadership corps of America-Jewry, for this corps is entirely Jewish. The
Jewish-American entity is Jewish as respects its head, American as respects its
In view of the complete lack of spirituality, intellect, political awareness,
and moral courage in the American population, the possibility of an American
revolt against Jewish domination has been entirely omitted. Such a thing is
only a possibility after America-Jewry suffers a thorough military defeat, and
even then only if it is followed by large-scale economic disasters.
The regimes of Washington
together make up a Concert of Bolshevism, just as the Culture States of the
West made up the Concert of Europe of the 18th century. Moscow
share all basic values, and recognize it mutually. No matter how strong their
political rivalry, they make "cultural" agreements whereby each may
export its brand of culture to the other. Thus Washington
sends the clown Bob Hope to Russia,
sends the cacophony expert Shostakovich to North
America, causing the intellectuals to gush with admiration.
The American cinema is not anti-Russian, regardless of preparations for the
Third World War. Compare this with the preparations for the Second World War,
when this same cinema created many thousands of hate-Germany films, which it is
still turning out.
Bolshevism means, as simple historical fact, destruction of the West and of the
remnants of its Culture. The Communist Manifesto sets forth a program to
accomplish this on the economic-social side. In the ten demands that it makes,
only nine are possible, and all these have been realized in the United
States, but not
one of them has been realized in Russia.
The barbarian nature of the Russians is itself Bolshevism, but Marxian
Communism is purely an export article in Russia,
while in the United
States, it is an
The reality of this Concert is shown especially by the Policy of America-Jewry
Much as it needs a German Army, it will not create a real German Army, but only
a mass of helpless rifle-battalions to be slaughtered by Russia
without a chance of winning. Both Russia
and America-Jewry have failed to get the best performance from their German
captives who make the rockets for them. Russia
overworks its German rocket-men, and America-Jewry has so thoroughly denationalized,
brain-washed and Americanized its German rocket-men that they are no longer
German, and have thus lost the source of their technical superiority, i.e.
their German inwardness. This is the final explanation why the German rockets
made in Russia
are better than the German, rockets made in the USA.
Most of the cinema in North America
and Russians as interesting and admirable, human and good. The cinema's purpose
in the general scheme of propaganda is to control the emotional attitudes of
the population. Control of the intellectual attitudes is the work of the press,
and here Russia
is treated negatively. Why this duality? Every ruling regime gives perforce in
its propaganda a picture of itself, and the Washington Zionist regime itself
suffers from this quality. Russia
is not a total enemy, but a rival. The Korean war, 1950-1953 expressed the
limited hostility of the Washington
regime toward Russia
and its official war-aim was not "victory" or "unconditional
surrender", but "a just truce".
When the Germans in Russia
make some new technical advance, Eisenhower congratulates the Moscow
regime. Roosevelt never
congratulated Hitler on such occasions. The Russian flag is flown in the United
States on all
festive, "international" occasions. Never did the German flag appear,
nor does it today. The fundamental ineradicable Jewish hatred of Germany
appears in the fact that even the Germany
they control directly is not permitted to sit among the United Nations, on a
par with the other puppets. The spate of anti-German films in the theatres and
on television continues unabated. The anti-Russian films are few indeed,
One conclusion emerges, of military-political significance: in the Third World
War, the Washington
regime will list Germany
among its enemies. Already the radio propagandists say "Russia
and Red Germany." The intention here is, not only that the German rifle
battalions be slaughtered by the Russian advance, but that the way be opened
for the bombardment of Germany
again, this time with more destructive bombs.
The Concert of Bolshevism is a reality only because of the attitude of the
Washington Regime. Russia
does not disturb it, since it works to their ends -- it gave them China,
But they do not take it seriously, any more than they regard the United Nations
as a serious thing.
We now come to the military aspect of the Third World
War, It is perfectly clear that the Washington
regime has put its entire faith in "strategic bombardment." They plan
to deliver the explosives to their targets by ballistic missiles, guided
missiles, submarines and airplanes, land-based and carrier-based. This faith in
bombardment is just that: it is faith, but not rational. Faith has certain
advantages, but not in the realm of technics. Belief that I will discover a new
weapon, will or at least, may, lead me to that discovery, but belief that this
weapon will destroy my enemy all by itself will not increase the power of the
weapon. Black magic would be better in this case, for it works directly on the
morale of the enemy, whereas the faith in the weapon merely assumes that if his
cities are destroyed, he will be disheartened.
is a porous target, and rockets are effective only against dense targets. The
Jewish-American citadel is far denser than the Russian citadel, and is thus
vulnerable to rockets to a far greater decree. America-Jewry would be better
off if rockets did not exist. In that case its citadel would be inviolate, and
it could never sustain a military disaster of the greatest magnitude, for its
armies would be at the antipodes and their victory or defeat would be of minor
consequence. Thus the basic Jewish-American military doctrine is one which
cannot possibly give it victory. But this same military doctrine, if adopted by
the enemy, could give victory to the enemy.
Russian morale is tough, because of the barbarian nature of the
soldier-material, and not because of good leadership, organization, or
indoctrination. The Jewish-American morale is poor, the soldier material is
utterly worthless in itself. This population has no political awareness, no
significant military tradition, no military instinct, no military ambition, and
no moral strength, and no respect for, or belief in anything whatever. This
youth is characterized by the Beatnik, the American form of the Nihilist. He
believes in nothing and respects nothing because there is nothing within his
range of vision worthy of respect or inspiring belief. The Beatnik is not an
insignificant entity: he is the ruling type in the American youth. He
represents the fashion, all other youth feel inwardly inferior to him, as
non-fashionable elements always do toward the fashion-corps.
Russian barbarians cannot be demoralized by rockets. The Beatnik can, because
he has no morale to start with, no inner participation. The Russian population
is young, and it is rural, mostly in fact, the rest in spirit. The American
population is old, and it is megalopolitan, mostly in fact, the rest in spirit.
Speaking in general, only rural people are good fighters, not city-people,
especially if the fighting is severe.
Rockets are merely artillery, and thus can never conquer. It is true that the
doctrine arose in military circles during 1914-1918 that "artillery
conquers the ground; the infantry occupies it." But this is mere
stupidity, on a level with the military leadership and conduct of that war. Only
infantry can conquer.
From this fact comes the Russian military doctrine. It derives from Clausewitz
and is valid for all wars between powers based on the same continent. That
doctrine is that the aim of war is the destruction of the enemy's armies by
decisive blows. The Russian military sees in the Jewish-American bombardment of
German cities in the Second World War mere stupidity, and here they are
correct. But this same Russian military has not yet fully grasped the fact that
the Clausewitz doctrine on The Aim of the War is not valid for intercontinental
warfare. As far as the Jewish-American puppet armies in Europe
go, the doctrine is correct. For Russian victory in Europe,
these puppet armies must be rounded up, as they inevitably will be. But there
still remains the Jewish-American citadel. How is Russia,
without massive means of sea-transport as it is, to destroy the Jewish-American
armies? It is simply not possible. Does this mean therefore that Russia
It is clear that both contestants in the Concert of Bolshevism have a ruling
military ideation according to which they cannot possibly win.
America-Jewry, which believes in rockets, can win only with infantry.
which believes in infantry, can win only with rockets.
So much for their similarity; now for the difference. Although the ruling
doctrine in Russian military circles is an infantry-oriented one (as it should be),
nevertheless the Russian military has equipped itself with good German rockets,
better than the German rockets of America-Jewry.
But the Military of America-Jewry, though it talks out of one side of its mouth
about "balanced forces," has not equipped itself with good infantry,
for the simple reason that it cannot, entirely lacking any human material which
could be shaped into good infantry. The Jewish-American naval forces now have
the doctrine that they are mere artillery auxiliaries. The submarines exist to
throw rockets; the carriers exist in order to carry airplanes to throw rockets;
The cruisers exist to -- yes, why do they exist? Away with them, to the
mothball closet! The naval battle at sea, the meaning of the fleet, is not
contemplated. Protection of commerce is forgotten, since overseas commerce will
almost all be cut off in the Third World War.
The Russian forces are prepared to fight with infantry, with artillery, with
armor, with air forces, with missiles, ballistic and guided, thrown from land
and from submarines. The American-Jewish forces are prepared to fight only with
Since the rocket is the only Jewish-American weapon, it is understandable that
they do not want to abolish atomic weapons, nor to agree to stop their further
testing and developing. By the same token it is understandable that the
Russians sincerely want to render illegal the only weapon which America-Jewry
can use against them.
But here only the Russian position is rational. The American-Jewish position
would make sense if (1) it could win with rockets, and (2) it had superiority
in rockets. But neither condition is present. It would be better to get out of
the competition before the war than to lose the war, but politicians in general
do not think that way.
The dispute rages in Russian military circles on whether American rocket
manufacturing, storing, and launching facilities should have top target
priority, or whether that should be given to American cities. Those who think
nationalistically, organically, patriotically, humanly, would attack the rocket
facilities first; those who think in terms of cold reason, regardless of
domestic damage and losses, would attack the great cities as the prior targets.
Now, it has been said that America-Jewry can win only
with infantry, and that Russia
can win only with rockets. These propositions must be fully explained.
First, the meaning of the concept to win. Immediately the political and
military planes separate themselves out. Politically, the concept of winning
means the conclusion of peace on terms satisfactory to one's self Militarily it
means that the enemy asks for peace.
This does not contradict Clausewitz in his statement that the military aim of
war is the destruction of the enemy's armies. It merely widens the concept of
military victory to cover the case, which arises now for the first time in
world-history, in which a war is fought between two powers whose armies can
have no contact with one another.
This assumes that in the first phase of the war the Jewish-American forces in Europe
and their local auxiliaries will be entirely destroyed or expelled from Europe,
of course. A minor series of operations will follow, hardly to be called a
phase of the war, i.e. the finishing of the complete domination of Asia
by Russian or Chinese arms. This will include the occupation of Hong
Kong and Singapore,
the neutralization of Pakistan,
the occupation of Persia,
the conquest of Turkey,
and the delivering of the Jewish-American puppet formations in the Near
East to the United Arab movement. A small-scale war
may also be necessary to clean out completely the Jewish-American bases in North
will be neutral or allied to Russia.
But after this phase, the issue of victory remains undecided. The
Jewish-American regime will not surrender, since the very existence of Jewry is
at stake, and the whole United
States and its
population is there to secure the existence of Jewry.
So here is a war between continents whose armed forces have no contact, nor can
they have any contact. Russia has no possibility of delivering a large army to
the North American continent, Nor is it possible for America-Jewry to deliver a
large army to the Eurasiatic continent, first because it has no such army, nor
can it raise it in the numbers and quality necessary, and second, because it is
impossible to mount an invasion of Eurasia from the North American continent.
Thus the only "contact" the hostile armies can have with one another
is in the limited form of an intercontinental artillery duel. By these means,
it is possible for neither contestant to destroy the armies of the other, since
these will be widely deployed, offering no target. The only real target for
intercontinental ballistic missiles is a large city. Here the United
States offers a
plethora of targets, and Russia
What is the effect of Jewish-American bombardment of Russian cities? And what
is the effect vice versa? The Russian is a peasant, whether or not he tills the
soil. He, is not city-oriented, even when he lives in the city. When the city
is destroyed, little is destroyed, so he feels, The American, and a fortiori
the Jew, is a megalopolitan, whether or not he lives in Megalopolis. When the
city is destroyed, all is destroyed, so he feels. He who reads may draw his own
conclusion at this point.
Next is the question of bombardment at intercontinental range by guided
missiles. Since their precise degree of accuracy is a
secret-secret-secret-secret matter, only common sense is available. Common
sense teaches first that at thousands of miles distance no rocket can be guided
to say, a factory, or within destructive range of it, and second, that against
every weapon, even superior weapons, defenses, even if not complete and
perfect, are always worked out. It would appear that guided missiles will be
simply an auxiliary to the basic artillery, namely ballistic missiles, and will
thus not be decisive.
Next is the question of bombardment by bomb-carrying aircraft. After the first
phase of the war, the heaviest Jewish-American aircraft will have to take off
on their bombing missions thousands of miles from their targets in Russia
These targets will be Russian rocket factories, stockpiles and launching
facilities, as far as they know where these are located. On this point there is
no doubt whatever that Russian counter espionage is many times as effective as
that of American-Jewry. There is also little doubt that Jewish-American
espionage in Russia
labors under almost invincible handicaps. Thus, these aircraft will not be too
well supplied with targets, and will not be decisive.
What was said above about bombardment at intercontinental range by ballistic
and guided missiles applies equally well to bombardment at continental ranges
by the same type of missiles, launched from ships of all types. And what was
said about land-based bombing aircraft applies still, even though with less
force, to bombing aircraft based on, aircraft-carrying ships. These have a
shorter distance to travel, but since they cannot destroy something whose
location is unknown to them, such airplanes are no more dangerous than
Jewish-American espionage makes them.
On the point of bombardment by aircraft, Russia
is thus better situated by virtue of the superiority of its espionage, and the
relative inferiority of the counter-espionage of America-Jewry. But the fact
that they have few if any aircraft carriers means that their aircraft must fly
thousands of miles before reaching the target.
We come back to the city as the target. If bombardment of cities is not
decisive, no other form of bombardment will be decisive. But it is quite clear
that only in the case of America-Jewry can bombardment of cities even possibly
be sufficient for a decision to ask for peace.
If this happens, an interesting new possibility opens up. In November 1918 Germany
surrendered to the English-led coalition, consisting of England,
etc. But after the surrender, England
continued the blockade, a war-measure after the war. Since the war was over,
this could not be called a means of destroying the enemy's armed forces. It was
solely a means of killing civilians, and in this blockade, continued until July
1919, a million people died of starvation in Germany.
was a civilized power, yet it continued war after surrender of its enemy. There
is thus the distinct possibility that barbarian Russia,
signatory to no treaty to mitigate the harshness of war, would continue to
after a surrender, in order finally to eliminate it as a potential world-power,
by complete destruction of its industrial potential (which is almost entirely
in cities). That which the Jewish-American-English-French forces did in Germany
after the Second World War; destruction of industrial plants, and irrational
plundering of natural resources in order to destroy them, could be equally well
done by Russia after the Third World War: further destruction of cities,
perhaps occupation (large armies might no longer be necessary) to destroy
industry systematically, on the pattern used by American-Jewish forces in
Europe 1945-1950. If there were no occupation, the forest areas could be
destroyed by systematic bombardment, converting most of the North American
Continent into desert.
The foregoing has assumed that Russia
would be able completely to occupy the Eurasiatic continent. How far is this
At present the Russian army is in a class by itself, being the only large army
in existence which is fully equipped with the best weapons and of good fighting
quality. The Chinese army is large, not fully, equipped, not equal to the
Russian in moral qualities. The Jewish-American army is quite inferior in size
to both its enemies, extremely well equipped, but of poor fighting quality. The
German army is small, entirely without equipment, entirely without morale. The
Turkish army is small well equipped, and of good moral quality. The Italian and
French armies are both small, ill-equipped and without morale. The English army
is small, well equipped, and without morale. The Spanish army is small, not
well equipped, but of good morale.
In a war between a coalition and a single power, the single power will win if
other conditions are equal. A coalition must outweigh a single power. The
coalition forces against Russia
in Europe, however,
are vastly outweighed by Russia
in addition to their decisive handicap of being quite lacking in fighting
The only army in the coalition of the Jewish-American forces in Europe
which can be expected to fight well is the Spanish. The terrain in Spain
also favors a defender. If De Gaulle is able to consolidate his regime he may
and, as already seen, neutrality works for Russia.
Not only France
would be affected by such a development. Neutrality is the wish of all the
peoples of Europe,
and this force will definitely reach the political plane if it's given the
encouragement of an example.
While it is possible that the Jewish-American forces might be able more or less
to stabilize a front in France, in Spain, or in Turkey, this possibility is
abstract at this moment, for the armies are neither in existence nor in a
position which could stop a Russian invasion force.
Thus, the assumption that the first phase of the Third World War will develop
as outlined above is one justified by the conditions of 1960.
No estimate would be complete which leaves two great political developments out
of account, both of recent years. The first is the Arab Revolt, led by a great
and vigorous man, Gamal Abdul Nasser. The second is the formation of
nationalist, neutralist regimes by such brilliant statesmen as Marshal Jozef
Broz Tito of Yugoslavia,
Nehru of India, Field Marshal Ayub Khan of Pakistan,
General Ibrahim Abboud of the Sudan,
Sekou Toure of Guinea,
Sukarno of Indonesia, Nkruniah of Ghana, and others. These personalities embody
an Idea, none are out for money or publicity. They live simply, work for and
live for their ideas. One such man, in a position of leadership, is a world-historical
force. All lead weak political units, and cannot by themselves fight either of
the great world-powers. But all want independence for their people; Nasser,
for example, for some 300,000,000 Moslems. Each is a symbol to great human
masses. Their significance, in each case, in this Estimate, is that they
diminish the Jewish-American power without augmenting the Russian-Chinese
power. By their Palestine
policy, the Zionists may even succeed in driving the Arab world to fight for Russia.
Eventually responsible leadership for a restive mass of some 180,000,000 Latin
Americans will evolve. Already the seeds of revolt against Jewish-American
economic domination have been sown. Witness Cuba.
The growing tide of neutralism in the world, is due to the political incapacity
of the leadership corps of America-Jewry. If this tide rises in Europe,
America-Jewry would be defeated before the war. De Gaulle is not a great man,
but if he is able to gain French independence, he will immediately find himself
the spiritual leader of all Europe,
pygmy though he is. De Gaulle is a cretin, but people will follow even a cretin
if he embodies their deepest, most natural, instinctive feelings. De Gaulle's
driving force is a vanity of super-dimensional extent. Even Churchill, the
embodiment of the Idea of Vanity itself, was still content to be a Zionist
executive with a front position, a big office, and a resounding title. But De
Gaulle wants more: he wants to be equal to the masters who created him and blew
him up like a rubber balloon. Because of the spiritual force upon which he has
accidentally alighted -- the universal European desire for neutrality -- he may
even succeed. An idiot might save Europe.
History has seen things as strange.
An unusual point among the historically-unique relationships of the
Third World War is that while neither side can win -- in the classical military
meaning -- neither can lose, in the classical military meaning of that word. The
armies of America-Jewry cannot destroy the armies of Russia,
and the armies of Russia
cannot destroy the armies of America-Jewry on the North American continent. Into
the middle of an Age of Annihilation Wars comes now a war in which political
and military annihilation is mutually impossible to the contestants.
But in a political sense, victory is still possible. Victory means, in the
Third World War, not annihilation of the opponent, but conclusion of peace on
one's own terms. Speaking thus of political victory, it is clear that
America-Jewry -- under the conditions of 1960 -- must lose, and Russia
holds the initiative, it has the moral force, it has the arsenal. America-Jewry
has no moral force, completely inadequate military forces, and has moreover a
military doctrine (or, perhaps, an anti-military doctrine?) according to which
it does not need any military force except artillery.
This Russian preeminence is not at all owing to Russian cleverness but solely
to its opponent's stupidity. To cite once more the unpublished
"Possibilities of Germany" from the year 1946: "In every respect
but one, Russia
is superior to the enemy. Technically, America-Jewry is better prepared. The
only way Russia
can overcome its handicap in this respect is through German brains. In a word, Russia
Since 1946, Russia
has obediently armed itself with such rockets as Germans have made for it, and
this has been its main cleverness.
It was not Russian cleverness which drove out Chiang from China,
but the Jewish-American agent Marshall. Russia
did not neutralize India
-- The Anglo-American troops there were wwithdrawn by order from Washington.
did not occupy Eastern Germany
-- America-Jewry gave it to Russia.
did not take the Suez Canal
-- Nasser did it. Russia
did not liberate Cuba
-- Cubans did that. Russia
is not making trouble in France
for America-Jewry -- that is being done by De Gaulle, and the Communist party
there has opposed him to the utmost. The Russian Communist Party in the Western
European countries harms the Russian interests, and merely serves as scapegoat,
bogey, and whipping boy for the Washington
Russian "successes" -- except for its German-made rockets -- are all
the gift of the Washington
regime. Jewish-American political stupidity is invincible. But the power-gifts
which the Washington
regime has made to Russia
are not explicable entirely by simple stupidity, simple incapacity. There is
the further factor at work that the Zionist Washington regime is on both sides
of most power-questions in the world. Its sole firm stand is its fundamental
anti-German position: Germany
must be destroyed, its young men must be slaughtered. In Algeria,
is on both sides: it is with the French Government, as its "ally": it
is with the rebels by virtue of its world-program of "freedom" for
everybody. In Egypt,
regime told Palestine,
to attack, and when Russia
rose, it told them to stop. It was, within a week, anti-Nasser and pro-Nasser. It
then evacuated. It held back Chiang when from his island, he would have
with whom the Washington
regime was then at war. It defended South
helped the Chinese maintain their supply line to the front. During the Chinese
War in Korea,
it made and negotiated peace at the same time, for years. In Cuba
it forbade exportation of arms to the loyal Batista and thus helped Fidel
Castro; now it is committed to the overthrow of Castro.
It is a psychological riddle, decipherable only thus: the Zionists have two
minds, which function independently. As Zionists, they are committed to the
destruction of the Western Civilization, and in this they sympathize with Russia,
with the Arabs, and as such they anathematize Germany,
which is the mind and heart of the Western Civilization. As custodians of the United
States, they must
half-heartedly remain at least the technical and political domination of that
Civilization even while destroying its soul and its meaning. In a word, they
are working simultaneously for and against the Western Civilization. Quite
obviously they are thus doing more damage than conferring benefit! If a
commander of a fortress sympathizes with the enemy, but yet insists in
defending the fortress rather than surrendering it, he has surely found the highest
formula of destruction.
Thus the newspaper tag of "East versus West" is meaningless. It is
East versus East, with the West supplying the lives and treasure for
represents the Principle of Stupidity, then Zionism represents the Principle of
Malice. Of course neither of the two is without the leading characteristic of
the other, but stupidity reigns in Moscow,
and Malice in Washington.
The orchestra is in the pit, the spectators gape uncomprehending, the curtains
rustle with expectation. The play is entitled "Where Ignorant Armies Clash
by Night." Stupidity is in the lead, supported by Malice. The producer is
Destruction, and the company is called The Forces of Darkness.
It is already the predetermined curtain-time. Will the drama commence on time?